The changing fortunes of Chevron deference have more to do with jurisprudence than ideology or partisanship.
SEC v. Jarkesy raises the issue of the balance of power between a decentralized civil society and a centralized, bureaucratic state.
For decades, civil rights agencies across government have largely ignored anti-Asian discrimination in education.
The recent inquiry on the invocation of the Emergencies Act shows the danger it poses to the rule of law.
In oral arguments, the justices asked the tough questions about "race-conscious" admissions.
Does Coalition for TJ portend the outcome of future affirmative action cases in education?
Justice Kavanaugh presented a view of precedent that centers on republican self-government.
What would the potential overturning of Roe portend for other substantive due process cases?
A recent Court decision demonstrates that Morrison has received a well-deserved burial.
The president's power to act in Court derives from his constitutional duty to carry out the law. He must, therefore, say what he believes the law to be.
We confront a crisis of constitutional misunderstandings—fundamental misunderstandings among much of the legal left; partial misunderstandings by others.
Just as Chevron was an iconic decision marking the rise of the administrative state, so its relative decline is also a powerful symbol.