fbpx

A French Revolution?

For the last three weeks, France has been a theater of demonstrations, and even riots, against taxation. This movement is called the gilets jaunes in reference to the high-visibility yellow security vests worn by protesters. (Under French law, all motorists must have one of these in their cars.)

The movement originates in a fed-up cohort of drivers being pushed around by the government. In July, for example, French officials decided, for “safety reasons,” to lower the speed limit on rural roads from 90 to 80 kilometers per hour. Nobody really believed the safety justification, with nearly every media commentator calling it a decision by a fiscally ailing government to raise more revenue through fines.

In August, President Emmanuel Macron decided to increase the taxation on diesel fuel, officially for environmental reasons. It touched off an anti-tax revolt, which for France is not a staple of political debate—at least not recently. The last important anti-tax demonstration was in 1906, and it was repressed bloodily by Georges Clémenceau, the leftwing head of the Home Office at the time.

Then there’s the one that most people think of, which began the 1789 Revolution. Of course, we are not yet in a revolutionary situation. But our predicament is in some ways close to 1789’s.

For one thing, the “elite” today as in the time of Marie Antoinette is very far from the people. It understands nothing about the “yellow vests” opposition. A worker earning around 1,000 Euros a month cannot take in stride a hike in his fuel charges of 100 Euros a month. The salvation of the planet is clearly not enough to convince him of the merits of this political decision. Especially when social networks recall for him that Emmanuel Macron told us, only two years ago, that diesel fuel was better for the environment than ordinary gasoline!

For another, let us examine the weight and inequity of taxation. In 1789, only the “Third Estate” was paying taxes; neither the clergy nor the nobility paid them. Nowadays, the middle class carries a huge proportion of  the burden of French taxation. The poor (and especially migrants) don’t pay very much except the VAT on consumption, and they, on the other hand, receive a lot of money from the welfare state. Billionaires, too, pay proportionally less than does the middle class, having ways to search out and benefit from legal forms of tax avoidance.

If the “Third Estate” paid a lot of taxes in 1789, it was really far less than today. Back then, one had to work 10 days a year to cover the entire tax bill; nowadays, it is on average 200 days a year. And that is not to speak of the public debt, really the equivalent of future taxation, which now represents around twice the GDP (if we integrate all the public debts, including the off-balance-sheet debt, like future pension payments to government workers).

Nor can the issue of migrants be ignored here. One of the tacit reasons for the “yellow vests” populist opposition to the government lies, indeed, in migration policy. As with the Trump voters in the United States, many French people of the middle class face the economic effects of competition with migrants to France. The massive number of newcomers presses on the salaries of Frenchmen and women and costs taxpayers a lot. Migration policy partly explains their loss of purchasing power.

Another feature of this movement that makes it unique is how it shows the tensions between the France of modern metropoles and “peripheral France” (in the phrase of the geographer Christophe Guilluy). And here too one thinks of those who catapulted Trump to the U.S. presidency. The “yellow vests” are people who lost a lot due to globalization—not only from an economic perspective, but also from a political and a cultural one. Out of tune with them are those who persist in believing in the “happy globalization” that was promised by former Prime Minister Alain Juppé (a mentor to Edouard Philippe, who now serves Macron as Prime Minister).

The “yellow vests” movement, impressively supported by French population, is polling higher and higher among the French as the weeks go by. At the end of November, 84 percent of those polled found the movement’s claims justified, which is very unusual.

Even the violence in the streets has not yet diminished this support. Perhaps this is because many observers see on social networks that this violence is not being committed by the “yellow vest” demonstrators themselves, but by far-Left activists using the movement to destroy symbols of capitalism (like banks), and even by some police officers in plain clothes fighting against their own colleagues to discredit the protesters.

The main weakness of the “yellow vests” is also their main strength: They have no organization and no leader. The movement was launched on the social networks, when ordinary people spoke into their webcams about why they were going to join the opposition. Their videos reached millions of viewers in a country of 65 million inhabitants. From this angle, the comparison might be to the “Arab Spring”: a claim to freedom passing from social networks out into the streets.

Given this lack of organization, many scenarios are possible.

The first one is the end of the movement. If the government foregoes repression and lays low, as it were, the movement might just peter out. The winter cold, the approach of Christmas feasts, could make the disgruntled simply go back to their normal lives. But, of course, this outcome would not switch off the anger, which would be bound to return with the next unpopular governmental policy decision.

A second scenario is a thoroughgoing takeover by the far Left, which as I said is already very powerful in the movement. We are seeing absurd Marxist claims come to the fore. One is a proposed new progressive taxation regime for fuel; and another is the proposed confiscation of empty flats in towns to allow the demonstrators who live in the countryside to become, with subsidized rents, town-dwellers living  near their jobs so they would no longer need to drive great distances (thus saving them fuel costs). Most of the demonstrators are clearly not far leftist: they clamor for more freedom, including more economic freedom. But the Left is nothing if it is not well organized, so it might well be able to steer the demonstrators where they don’t want to go.

A third scenario would be invocation of the famous Article 16 of the French constitution, allowing the President to gather to himself not just executive power but legislative power, to quell the unrest.

But we could also see—and it’s the hope of many demonstrators—a fourth scenario. That would be the birth of a populist movement like the Five Star movement in Italy or the Tea Party in the United States. This would be very interesting, and could augur real change in the French political landscape where, currently, populists and conservatives are unable to ally, unlike in many other European countries.

The only thing missing for this last scenario to come about, and it is a huge lack, is the scarcity of legitimate and skilled spokesmen. Will we see them emerge? Time will tell.

Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on December 04, 2018 at 10:12:33 am

[…] tient informés nos amis anglo-saxons de l’actualité française dans un article publié sur Law and Liberty. Il y évoque notamment les différents scénarios de sortie de crise […]

read full comment
Image of Quels scénarios pour les Gilets jaunes ? - Le Salon Beige
Quels scénarios pour les Gilets jaunes ? - Le Salon Beige
on December 04, 2018 at 11:38:12 am

Ah the French, I can never seem to understand them.... thanks for the insight!

read full comment
Image of Frank Morgan
Frank Morgan
on December 04, 2018 at 13:01:11 pm

I find it interesting that no mention is made of the "connection" between the latest climate alarmist assertions that diesel fuel is actually worse for the environment and that the EU has determined that deisel engines are to be eliminated within the next three (?) decades. And all this after years of being told that diesel was better nvironmental choice.

Is this another example of an Elite Leader FOLLOWING the latest elitist fad / fantasy?

Goodness Gracious, as much as I dislike Le Grand Charles, where is he when the French need him?

Europe is proud to be lead by the Three M's (morons) - Merkel, May and Macron, none of whom are either capable or desirous of Leading but rather are congenitally predisposed to follow the instructions of their Globalist enablers / benefactors.

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on December 04, 2018 at 18:19:58 pm

Based on my observation of American movies and American politics since the 1940's and European movies and politics (including French) since the 1960's I speculate that there is a direct correlation between a decline in the quality of movies and a decline in political culture.

read full comment
Image of Pukka Luftmensch
Pukka Luftmensch
on December 04, 2018 at 18:44:40 pm

Macron, the French and the Americans who would follow his lead strike me as having the hubris of Agamemnon, the courage of Falstaff, the wisdom of Chauncey Gardiner and the political common sense and economic understanding of Alexandria Acosio-Cortez.

read full comment
Image of Pukka Luftmensch
Pukka Luftmensch
on December 05, 2018 at 10:23:05 am

I think you just hit for the polemical cycle.

read full comment
Image of QET
QET
on December 05, 2018 at 11:41:41 am

True - now let us apply this theory to the USA and Hollywood - even worse.

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on December 06, 2018 at 01:07:29 am

[…] Praise of the Gilets Jaunes (Yellow Vests) – Brendan O’Neill, The Spectator A French Revolution? – Guillaume De Thieuloy, Law and Liberty Ukraine has “Sacred Duty” to Defend Against […]

read full comment
Image of THVRSDAY CIVILIZATION VVATCH EDITION – Big Pulpit
THVRSDAY CIVILIZATION VVATCH EDITION – Big Pulpit
on December 06, 2018 at 07:01:53 am

Fine metaphor, " hit for the polemical cycle."

One's OPS for invective polemics on social media platforms is a lagging indicator of succcess in the Culture War.
In the future I'll use your conceit (without attribution.)

Yet, I raised only two replies, yours and Gabe's, both from my side of the Siegfried Line.
It seems that the Hun are so clueless as to not know when they've been insulted.

Lesson Learned: Don't lob literary allusions at folks to the east of our trenches; the entirety of their reading consists of critical race theory, Obama's Title IX Guidance Documents for sex-discrimination in restrooms, and bias-confirmation "journalism" (sic) in the NYT (the Gray Lady is so decayed that maggots are tunneling through her empty eyeball sockets into a vacant cranium.)

read full comment
Image of Pukka Luftmensch
Pukka Luftmensch
on December 07, 2018 at 17:32:42 pm

And now for some updates on the EU and how The Huns are once again at the throats of the EU's subject nations and possibly why the French people are going bonkers:

Herein the first:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/07/germany-most-prolific-attempting-send-migrants-other-eu-countries/

Or as the Huns (and now the EU) have always believed:
Do unto toehrs BEFORE they do unto you.

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on December 07, 2018 at 17:35:30 pm

And herein the 2nd:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/07/germany-and-france-to-europe-accept-migrants-or-pay-up/

wherein the Hums and the Frogs demand payment from the subject nations for not taking in those that they did not, and do not want in the first place.

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on December 07, 2018 at 17:38:10 pm

And the 3rd:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/07/merkel-told-eu-countries-not-move-embassies-jerusalem-save-iran-deal/

wherein we find the Huns dictating the foreign relations of the subject nations and forbidding other EU countries to move their embassy to Jerusalem.

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on December 07, 2018 at 17:47:00 pm

And finally, just in case anyone thought the "demise" of the Huns version of a fat Lady in a Pantsuit would mean a change of course, there is this:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/07/race-leadership-merkels-party-determine-continuation-major-change-policy/

wherein Merkel's hand picked (groomed) successor has acceded to leadership of the CDU. Mutatis mutandis!!!

Interestingly enough, the candidate with the 2nd most votes was a conservative who vigorously opposed the EU and UN Migration pact and disdains the inflated claims of the climate alarmists.
With Merkel refusing to give up the reins until 2021, it would appear the the arrogance of the Hun will continue unabated. All that is necessary for it to continue well after 2021 is the small matter of the 8continuing* education of Ms Merkel's little flunkie.

Let us see how that portends for the French AND their dreams of a restoration of the ancien regime.

I'm luvvin' it!

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on December 08, 2018 at 02:27:51 am

[…] Revolution? Some certainly think so. Here are some voices to that speculation, try this link French revolution 2018 or this one French revolution […]

read full comment
Image of The nations are angry! - Christians in Babylon
The nations are angry! - Christians in Babylon
on January 23, 2019 at 09:30:58 am

[…] 4 décembre déjà, dans une analyse sur le mouvement social publiée sur le site libéral-conservateur américain Law & …, l’entrepreneur et conseiller politique envisageait quatre scénarios. Le dernier serait la « […]

read full comment
Image of Un complot dus Salon beige sur les Gilets jaunes ? - Le Salon Beige
Un complot dus Salon beige sur les Gilets jaunes ? - Le Salon Beige

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.