fbpx

American Polarization and Extremism Are Just a Return to Normalcy

The influence of two wars—the Civil War and World War II—disrupted otherwise normal currents in American politics. The disruptions came so early and lasted so long that commentators mistake the exception for the norm. For better or for worse, the increasing political polarization and extremism we see today is no more than a reversion to the American norm.

The influence of the Civil War on party identification created two political parties as much regionally-based as they were driven by ideology. What commentators take as increasing polarization today is a return to normal patterns of partisanship with the dissipation, after more than a century, of the bitter regional divisions created by the Civil War. The influence of World War II is more diffuse, as much a convenient dividing line as it is a causal factor. Nonetheless, Americans tend to forget extremism in American politics, often violent, was the norm from the 1880s through the 1930s. The social and political homogenization created by, or at least indicated by, the mobilization for World War II muted the extremes.

It may seem odd to argue that ideological polarization is the normal state of American political parties, especially given measures indicating increased polarization occurred only over the last couple of generations. The thing is the disruption of the Civil War occurred so early in the nation’s history, and the half-life of residual ill-will lasted for the better part of a century, that we’ve experienced the exception more than we’ve experienced the rule. Nonetheless, polarization is the normal state of affairs.

After the Civil War, white southerners refused to identify as Republicans—the party of Abraham Lincoln, after all. And while never quite as dramatic as southern behavior, Republicans maintained a residual pull in the North, at least among white Protestants. Almost a century before pasting Democrats in 1972 as the party of “acid, amnesty and abortion” (although a Democrat originated the phrase), in 1884 Republicans ran against the Democrats as the party of “Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion.”

Both parties had thick tails at the extremes of their distributions; there was lots of overlap between the parties. Large numbers of conservatives identified as Democrats, many liberals identified as Republicans. It took almost a century for ideology finally to erode sectional commitments.

The “solid south” began notably to separate from the Democratic fold in the 1950s. The presidential vote in 1964 presaged the final end of Civil War regionalism. In that year’s presidential election, the heart of the former Confederacy went wholesale for Republican nominee Barry Goldwater, the north went solidly for Lyndon Johnson. After that election southern conservatives began voting Republican further down the ticket; northeastern liberals voted Democratic more consistently as well. The overlap of the tails in the ideological distribution of each party began to thin as regional influence on party membership shrank and as each party coalesced more consistently around ideology. This is the normal pull of a two-party system. While the lengthy half-life of the Civil War’s regional bitterness overwhelmed this pull for almost a century, it was the disruption – the exception. Ideological polarization is the rule.

Polarization differs from extremism, although commentators often conflate the two. Reducing partisan variance within political parties naturally increases partisan polarization. That is, the overlap between the parties naturally thins as variance decreases. Less variance within each party means less in common between the parties even if the median member of each party stays put.

“Extremism,” on the other hand, isn’t necessarily even a partisan category. Nonetheless we can think of it as extending out the ideological distribution.

Americans tend to forget the angry, bitter, and even violent extremism on both sides of the political spectrum from roughly 1880 through the start of World War II. We forget the politically-motivated assassination of President William McKinley in 1901. Anarchists targeted leading political and business figures with numerous mail bombs in 1919.

Violence aside, the Socialist Party presidential candidate attracted six percent of the popular vote in 1912, and over 16 percent in 1924 (candidate Robert La Follette received almost five million votes that year).

Extremism during this period was certainly not limited to the left. During the 1920s, membership in the Ku Klux Klan peaked at somewhere between 4 to 6 million members—a significant percentage of the eligible population of the time. During this period the Klan not only advocated white supremacy, but was anti-Catholic, pro-Prohibition (part of its anti-Catholicism), anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant. During this time the Klan’s violence targeted political outsiders, as opposed to the political and business leaders the anarchists targeted. Moreover, the Klan’s violence was concentrated particularly in the South in support of Jim Crow oppression of blacks, with some violence aimed against bootleggers.

WW II wrung out a large measure of this extremism on both sides of the spectrum. Beyond the homogenizing tendencies promoted by the War effort itself, post-War prosperity, government suppression, and additional social pressure to conform stemming from the Cold War, all muted extremism during and immediately after the War.

The return of American extremism, particularly violent extremism, has not been as seamless as the increase in polarization, with episodes punctuating post-War American history. Nonetheless, recent trends herald the return of sizeable blocks of both socialist and nativist constituencies not seen since the 1920s.

Looking around today, the disruptions of the two wars have dissipated; the U.S. increasingly reflects its inherent, longer-run political tendencies. Tendencies that, in the short-to-medium-term can be overwhelmed by more pressing commitments forged in the heat of war. Nonetheless, what we are witnessing today is pretty much who we are politically. Bitter political disagreement is the underlying pull of American politics, no matter how that pull might be papered over, sometimes for decades. The increasing polarization and extremism we see today in America is, for better or for worse, only a return American normalcy.

Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on January 18, 2019 at 08:41:32 am

Let's be clear about "polarization" and "extremism" cause and effect circa 2018: a play in two acts.

Act I

Kid: Dad, give me $100 for an allowance.
Dad: I'll give you $10, and there are chores attached to it.
Kid: OMG DAD YOU ARE SUCH AN EXTREMIST AND YOU'RE POLARIZING THIS FAMILY!!!!!!!

Act II

Me: Hitler did not assassinate JFK.
Them: WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING HITLER YOU ALT-RIGHT FACIST???!!!!!!!

read full comment
Image of QET
QET
on January 18, 2019 at 11:16:52 am

Wallace voters from 1968 voted for Carter in 1976, and the Arkansas Legislature was first controlled by Republicans in the Obama Administration. During the Reagan years, former segregationist Jamie Whitten, D-MS, chaired the House Appropriations Committee, Russell Long, D-LA, played a prominent role in the Senate, and Robert Byrd, D-WV, who had been Senate majority leader during the Carter years, chaired the Senate Appropriations Committee. It was only as the salience of race declined that Republicans came to dominate southern suburbs, and thus southern congressional elections. In short, other than Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, segregationists remained Democrats until they died--which was long after 1964.

read full comment
Image of Kevin Gutzman
Kevin Gutzman
on January 18, 2019 at 15:01:08 pm

Pre-WWII America was fundamentally different from the regime that emerged after 1945, the Supreme Court saw to that. You simply cannot compare the two; apples and oranges and all that.

The current situation is not a return to normalcy it's an insurgency against the regime that governing elite has forged over the last 73 years.

read full comment
Image of EK
EK
on January 18, 2019 at 17:03:53 pm

The history of the modern Republican party is the story of factions where moderates were driven out and Conservatives took over and those same conservatives were driven out by those even further to the right. It's the story of the grievance stoked pitch fork brigades of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan who like Trump also fed their followers the pap of fear, anger and frustration. It's the story of movements like the John Birch Society who's association with the party was successfully purged and the Tea Party movement which was abducted by unscrupulous politicians and right wing media hacks for their own financial gain. Finally it's the story of elected grifters who failed, folded and made unrealistic promises to desperate constituents that devoured their empty narrative. The story of the modern GOP is to perpetuate re-election and stay the entrenched "Army on the Potomac" by promising the gullible "Vote one more time and there will be change."

read full comment
Image of Bob Manderville
Bob Manderville
on January 18, 2019 at 17:28:21 pm

The history of the modern Republican party is the story of factions where the moderates were driven out and Conservatives took over and those same Conservatives were driven out by those even further to the right. It's the story of the grievance stoked populist pitch fork brigades of Senator Joseph McCarthy, Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan who like Trump fed their followers the pap of fear, anger and frustration. It's the story of movements like the John Birch Society who's association with the party was successfully purged and the Tea Party movement which was abducted by unscrupulous politicians and right wing media hacks for their own financial gains. Finally it's the story of elected grifters who failed, folded and made unrealistic promises to desperate constituents that devoured their empty narrative. It's the story of lies to the gullible that "If you vote one more time things will be different" so that they could perpetuate re-election and stay the entrenched "Army on the Potomac"

read full comment
Image of Bob Manderville
Bob Manderville
on January 23, 2019 at 05:19:03 am

Nice post. I have generally thought that WWII has had a homogenizing/conforming effect on the US population (and law), and we've been regressing to the mean.

I hadn't pondered the idea that the Civil War was similar. I guess I don't see it's dynamics dissipating.

read full comment
Image of nobody. really
nobody. really
on February 27, 2019 at 05:52:12 am

[…] of socialism is the only realistic socialist game in town. But in America’s not-so-distant pasta past with greater ideological extremes that Americans got used to in their post-WWII experience—broad swaths of more-radical socialists held economic equality and redistribution were merely […]

read full comment
Image of Socialist Freedom, Economic Security, and Work
Socialist Freedom, Economic Security, and Work
on April 02, 2019 at 12:40:44 pm

[…] the continuation of the polarization in America (is this really a return to the norm, though), with DJT only a symptom of the split, not the cause, we need to look at the historical roots to […]

read full comment
Image of “Woke Capitalism” or its Suicidal Cousin: Will These Be Only Some of the Ways We Wage a Slow Simmering Civil War? | Maine Musing
“Woke Capitalism” or its Suicidal Cousin: Will These Be Only Some of the Ways We Wage a Slow Simmering Civil War? | Maine Musing
on May 24, 2019 at 12:31:18 pm

[…] Read more: lawliberty.org […]

read full comment
Image of American Polarization and Extremism Are Just a Return to Normalcy – News
American Polarization and Extremism Are Just a Return to Normalcy – News
on September 28, 2019 at 21:35:23 pm

[…] American Polarization and Extremism Are Just a Return to Normalcy, by JAMES R. ROGER, Law and Libert… […]

read full comment
Image of Your Revealing Trump Bargain – The Drama of America
Your Revealing Trump Bargain – The Drama of America
on February 29, 2020 at 12:54:29 pm

Politics is the battleground where our public moral debates take place.

Through these debates the members of the group are motivated to move in one or another direction.

Eventually, the problem is resolved by time, or a clear consensus develops.

Political argument and division is a natural aspect of democracy.

read full comment
Image of Stephen Martin Fritz
Stephen Martin Fritz

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.