There is no social engineering plan or national industrial policy that can solve the problems of individualism and weak communities.
Defending Freedom
Ken Masugi raises some questions for me about libertarianism. I fear, though, that we may be talking a bit past one another.
Libertarianism is a vague term, and I am a somewhat unorthodox libertarian. I base my libertarianism on an indirect utilitarianism (or more precisely welfare consequentialism), and I am a very moderate libertarian, who incorporates a large strand of fusionism. Ken appears to have been assuming I was a more orthodox libertarian. Nonetheless, I thought I would write a couple of words in response.
Most importantly, Ken seems to wonder how a libertarian society might defend itself. I suppose the question is why it would not be able to do so. If one includes classical liberalism within the category of libertarianism – and I certainly do – then the government can certainly tax to fund national defense. A volunteer army would also be entirely consistent with these libertarian or classical liberal principles. People have often been willing to volunteer to defend free societies.
Ken might wonder whether a military draft would be needed to defend a classical liberal society, as it seems to have been required during WWII. This is a complicated question, but let me offer a brief response. There are a variety of institutional mechanisms that could be used to avoid the need for a draft. Higher pay for those who serve is obvious. I also believe a set of contingent contracts – where a person agrees to serve in case a war emerges – would also make sense. Finally, in a world with nuclear weapons, a war of survival seems unlikely to require a draft, and our country has recently been able to fight two wars at once without a military draft.
In the end, I guess I just don’t understand Ken’s concerns. He writes of a libertarian country, “who would defend such a country or even want it to continue?” Well, I believe that freedom is a great thing and that living a life with freedom and the wealth it produces is very desirable. When freedom has prevailed, people see that it is a good thing and they support it. So who would defend such a country? Most of the people who live there.