I Sing of Arms and the Man

Clint Eastwood’s American Sniper tells the story of Navy Seal Chris Kyle, the deadliest sniper in American military history with 160 confirmed kills. The film opens in Fallujah with Kyle confronting what will be his first two kills, a woman and a young boy who advance with a grenade toward a column of Marines. Kyle’s juvenile Marine escort states the obvious: “If you’re wrong, they’ll send your ass to Leavenworth.” Kyle shoots the boy and then the woman when she picks up his dropped grenade and attempts to throw it.

Bradley Cooper’s portrayal of Kyle here and throughout the film might be called the “inward turn.” Kyle isn’t overwhelmed by the event, but we sense that it is merely the first of many dramatic killings whose troubled imprint on Kyle will emerge in due course. After their deaths, he breathes in, closes his eyes, and then prepares for the next shot.

And so the audience must wonder: is this the mark of the sniper in action? He is not bloodthirsty, nor awed by his kills, but merely businesslike and methodical. But there’s something more: might it also be the mark of an American soldier, a Texas cowboy, an Evangelical Christian–the film underscores all three elements–who believes he possesses clarity and purpose even amid the horrors of war?

Kyle, the film discloses, quickly earns the title “Legend” for his pinpoint shooting acumen. Marines in the 2004 battle of Fallujah believed that the angel of death was on their side, with Kyle above them “banging on the long gun.” Readers of Kyle’s autobiography, which has sold over a million copies, know that Kyle found himself in war, in dealing death.

He completed four tours of duty in Iraq, spending nearly 1,000 days fighting, and as the film painfully details, doing so at tremendous cost to his sanity and his family.

The film, in my judgment, refrains from glorifying Kyle or the Iraq War itself, but depicts his steadfastness to the job he is given. That isn’t to say we aren’t drawn to Cooper’s Kyle. Character is story, and we are given here an American soldier who moves us with his refusal to quit, with his belief that his service saves the lives of his comrades. We don’t doubt that that is so; but such a film, and of course its title, will raise questions. Is being an unseen attacker—a sniper—somehow not the height of valor in war?

By the same token, director Eastwood does not slight Kyle or the war in which he fought. American Sniper refrains from trafficking in stereotypes—either of a rogue killer or of wayward units commanded by bad leaders.

Eastwood is a storyteller, and he has an amazing story to work with here. The life of Chris Kyle is enough; politics is shoved to the side. A war-wearied nation will surely be grateful for that as it flocks to this film.

The most striking evidence of Kyle’s character is his response to the death of fellow Seal and close friend, Marc Lee (played by Luke Grimes). We know that Lee is troubled about the war. Unlike Kyle, he no longer sees the point of the fight. In one scene, he sees Kyle’s small Bible and asks him “You got a God?” Lee isn’t being snide; he is reaching out to try to find the meaning he doesn’t have. Kyle responds very directly, “We’re here because there’s evil here.”

Where Lee is reflective, Kyle is transparently not. Are we to find Kyle lacking for failing to ponder why his continued sacrificial service is needed year after year? Why doesn’t the endlessness of the conflict strike him? In other words, how is it that the shifting enemies he faces were even better fighters when he left in 2008 (as the real Kyle noted in his autobiography)? We know, but this character seems not to, that something in America’s war effort went wrong, badly so.

Alternatively, are we to understand that Kyle’s way is the one that’s necessary to be an effective participant in any war? Perhaps with Lee and Kyle, we face the irreconcilable truths that exist in any war. These are even more pronounced in the campaigns waged by democratic countries that are awash in debate, ensuring that the lines separating trust, obedience, and dissent aren’t always clear. We struggle with knowing whom we should give ourselves to. Lee and Kyle represent that for us.

A key moment arrives when Lee’s mother reads, at his funeral, from a poignant letter he sent her a few weeks before his death in combat:

Glory is something men chase, and others find themselves stumbling upon not expecting to find it. Either way, it is a noble gesture that one finds bestowed upon them. My question is when does glory fade away and become the wrongful crusade or an unjustified means which consumes one completely. I’ve seen war and I’ve seen death . . .

Her grief-choked voice breaks off as the rifle salute commences. Kyle’s wife, Taya (played by Sienna Miller), who has previously told him that when his war ends, he will have to “find a way back to us,” later uses Lee’s statement to confront her husband. She wants to know what he thought of it. His response is terse but authentic: “He died in an ambush, but that letter killed him, not the ambush. He let go.”

Lee had become more dangerous to himself than to the enemy. He was indulging—almost selfishly we sense from Kyle’s response—in remorse. His war had ended; he stayed too long.

But the things discussed in that posthumously read letter, somewhere on the road of glory, its demise, and the events of war consuming and destroying the warrior, indicate the choice that Kyle himself must make. His war, as his wife said, must end. Otherwise, as Lee told him, he will lose sight of everything else.

Kyle never understood himself to be pursuing glory, hence his dismissive-sounding response. According to his own assessment, Kyle found immense value in his work. He killed bad guys and protected American soldiers. He returned to the fight because it wasn’t finished. In that sense, Lee’s reflections on glory, on a war that seemed to have gone off course, were beside the point. But Kyle, though he may not have been consumed with glory, was still almost consumed by the war. We might also wonder if Kyle had not pursued glory. The decorated sniper disputed his official number of kills—he said it was more like 250. Does not Kyle wear his glory openly when he instructs us on his actual kills? Why wasn’t 160 enough? Both figures are a heap of death dealt to America’s enemies.

When to let go? Not yet—the U.S. military flies its ace sniper back into Iraq to fight again. His final kill in the film is his nemesis Mustafa, a Syrian Olympic team sniper. The shot made at over 2,100 yards ends Kyle’s war. He knows it immediately.

In Texas, he does find his way home. The real Chris Kyle struggled mightily in this regard but by all accounts, he found something he could call peace, and he loved his wife and children. He undoubtedly struggled with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, with alcohol, and violence (in his memoir he admits to several booze-fueled bar brawls). I’d like to believe that Kyle did in fact deck Jesse Ventura at a California bar, but a court, apparently, found otherwise and awarded the former Minnesota governor $1.8 million dollars in a defamation suit against Kyle’s widow. Kyle, it seems, may have told some stories.

After the war-fighting scenes end, the movie loses steam because it relegates Kyle’s recovery to a quick resolution sequence. It shows in less than 10 minutes what must have been an incredible road back for the rifleman. Much of that road was paved by assisting other soldiers in healing from their many wounds. In the end—and this too is barely present in the movie—Kyle’s service finally killed him: A troubled former Marine, whom he was trying to help, shot Kyle and another friend at a gun range.

The love between Kyle and his wife is evident. We get that in the film, but we also don’t get enough of her struggle and her own development. I suspect most Americans will look beyond this shortcoming. Their love holds. Kyle, the American warrior, like all good warriors, as Ulysses told us, wants to build a home.

Despite Eastwood’s attempt to make a film that is above the once-rancid debate about the Iraq War, American Sniper could be a bridge for many Americans back to a war they deliberately forgot. In a nation strongly divided, it hardly needs to be said, there is a strong consensus of affirmation for the military. We know that the Iraq War failed, and as much as the blame can be found in the unreachable objectives of Bush’s own war for democracy, it also rests with many of us, who were too quick to approve the endeavor and then separated along harshly opposed lines as the war came apart.

To see Kyle’s portrayal in this film is a vivid reminder of those on whom the war fell, who suffered tremendously as they poured themselves into the fight. America’s attitude toward the war will likely evolve with time into a more positive appraisal. If so, American Sniper may contribute to this reflection as the signature cinematic treatment of the Iraq War and the film that endures in the nation’s mind.

Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on January 12, 2015 at 12:15:05 pm

this article was beautifully written. thank you ..

read full comment
Image of bob e
bob e
on January 12, 2015 at 13:25:22 pm

Wonderfully written and balanced. I look forward to seeing the movie. I saw several interviews he gave and when questioned about being a sniper his responses provided insights both of Kyle and the mindset of a sniper.

read full comment
Image of Louise Markovitch
Louise Markovitch
on January 12, 2015 at 14:48:24 pm

I saw this movies the other day. It is startling how full it is of mundane scenes; Eastwood seems to have a taste for understatement; Kyle seems to share that. There is not much of Kyle in the movie; he threatens to turn into a tragic hero in his dissatisfaction with how the war is fought & then that he is not fighting it anymore. It seems to me, maybe these things would change if America stopped losing wars or if her warrior class had any sense that it was a deficiency or failure in them that caused defeat. It's hard to put together the extraordinary skill & the manliness of the warrior with the startling failure, year after year, that predictably describes the politics. Refusing to reflect on things might become a necessity, whether because of the job or the circumstances.
Maybe it was wrong to attempt to avoid the political fights that seem to have torn your country apart & brought back anti-war hysteria. Maybe all your movies can do is show that the failure & what caused it were not enough to break this man & his faith in your country. I don't think that can justify the war by itself, but anyone who looks to what is noble would go a long way toward concluding that it was right to fight & that victory was well deserved.

read full comment
Image of titus techera
titus techera
on January 12, 2015 at 14:55:04 pm

Very insightful. It is important for us to come to terms with the Iraq war and this movie can help. Thanks Richard for your thoughtful analysis of this significant movie.

read full comment
Image of Carter LeCraw
Carter LeCraw
on January 12, 2015 at 20:55:17 pm

[…] I Sing of Arms and the Man […]

read full comment
Image of Remembering Walter Berns - Freedom's Floodgates
Remembering Walter Berns - Freedom's Floodgates
on January 13, 2015 at 05:17:24 am

cloud storage servers

I Sing of Arms and the Man | Online Library of Law & Liberty

read full comment
Image of cloud storage servers
cloud storage servers
on January 13, 2015 at 08:31:30 am

This is a well written review and overview of a controversial subject.......the War in Iraq and the soldiers who fought in it. With that said,I would suggest that readers of this review get a copy of the book "War Is A Racket" by 2 time Congressional Medal of Honor recipient Marine General Smedley Butler. As General Butler explains wars are fought not for "democracy" or other noble causes but for the profits of arms manufacturers,corporate interests,natural resources and the egos of politicians. In the end it is the common soldier who fights the wars and the civilians that pay for the wars that are the true victims and losers.

read full comment
Image of libertarian jerry
libertarian jerry
on January 14, 2015 at 09:44:51 am

Why do you say that your author here is Medal of Honor winner--surely, you mean, he's a victim who got wise to being victimized & to having participated in others' being victimized! If, on the other hand, it matters that he was decorated--shouldn't it mattered that other men who were also decorated, like Chris Kyle, disagree? Or would only the opinions of Medal of Honor recipients matter?

read full comment
Image of titus techera
titus techera
on January 19, 2015 at 16:34:20 pm

Thank you for this essay on "American Sniper." Very much appreciated it.

Would quibble though, with this statement:

We know that the Iraq War failed, and as much as the blame can be found in the unreachable objectives of Bush’s own war for democracy, it also rests with many of us, who were too quick to approve the endeavor and then separated along harshly opposed lines as the war came apart.

I guess we can say that Iraqi is a failure today, what with the IS marching. The unitary state of Iraq, including Kurdistan will never be put right, Humpty Dumpty has fallen.

But, this was not the case in 2008. The 2007 surge worked. Everywhere throughout Iraq, in 2009, 2010 violence was down and trending lower month over month, year over year.

What changed?

The untimely pullout of American forces, the control rod in the reaction allowed the system to go critical. Indeed, the entire region from Yemen in the southeast Arabian Peninsula north through Lebanon, and northeast through Syria and Iraq is going critical.

Seventy years on, US Forces have maintained a continuous presence in Germany, England and Italy. US Forces never left Japan and Korea. Now we are tepidly putting a few GIs here and there in Iraq, too few to succeed, just enough to invite trouble.

NO, Mr Reinsch, US forces had 'won" Iraq up to the time they were prematurely removed.

Someone else "lost Iraq" -- not the US boots on the ground.

read full comment
Image of Sandy Daze
Sandy Daze
on September 13, 2017 at 08:36:59 am

Extremely shrewd. It is critical for us to grapple with the Iraq war and this motion picture can offer assistance. Much obliged Richard for your attentive investigation of this huge motion picture.

read full comment
Image of Ayesha
on September 23, 2017 at 04:02:12 am

Superbly composed and adjusted. I anticipate seeing the motion picture. I saw a few meetings he gave and when addressed about being a sharpshooter his reactions gave experiences both of Kyle and the outlook of a rifleman.

read full comment
Image of Alka Talwar
Alka Talwar

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.