fbpx

Last Year’s Higher Education Reform by the Obama Administration

President Obama’s proposal to address the rising costs and other problems of higher education has occasioned a fair bit of commentary. (See for example this interview with Richard Vedder.)

Relatively little commentary, however, has been directed towards an actual program that was finalized last year. Here is a summary:

[T]he government issued the final regulations for the new Pay As You Earn student loan repayment plan, an initiative of the Obama administration. 77 Fed. Reg. 66088….Although the regs are quite complex, the bottom line is this:

Graduates currently in school or who graduated last May who DO NOT do public service work need not repay more than about 7% of their income toward their federal (that is, federally guaranteed or federally-issued) student loans, for 20 years. After 20 years, all remaining principal and interest is forgiven.

Graduates who perform 120 months of public service (at least 30 hours a week for any federal, state, or local government, or any 501(c)(3) organization) get forgiveness after 10 years instead of 20 years.

There is quite a bit that is questionable about this, but let me just mention two aspects. First, it is not clear why there should be further subsidies of students who have borrowed money. Yes, the loans are large, but should the government really be subsidizing students who tend to come from higher income families and who will be earning more than the average person?

Second, and more important, what justifies a special privilege for students who go into public service? In some cases, salaries may be lower, but working conditions and job security are better than in the private sector. Moreover, why would we want to have further subsidies for government workers? It is hardly clear that the public interest is promoted more by the government than the private sector and the public sector already has a large number of subsidies provided to it.

Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on August 27, 2013 at 09:54:15 am

Third, where is loaning money to students in the Constitution?

read full comment
Image of John Ashman
John Ashman
on August 27, 2013 at 19:42:32 pm

John:

It comes right after the provision that says that a College Education is a fundamental right. However, this provision is going to be amended to assure that no one should be required to pay for that education.
Don't mean to be too acerbic here, but based on my experience with many recent graduates, I would say that you get what you pay for and at least the guvmn't is finally going to be honest about and price accordingly!!!!

I was going to sign off "Sincerely" but that would probably be pushing it a little too far..

gabe

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.