fbpx

The Golden Age of Podcasts and Sam Harris’s Waking Up

If I look back at my activities, I would say that one of the biggest changes has been the increased time I spend listening to podcasts. I used to regularly listen to The Great Courses lectures (previously known as The Teaching Company). But in recent years, I spent almost all of my free listening time accessing podcasts.

And with good reason! Some of the best discussions are on podcasts. This is clearly true of intellectual pursuits, where one can listen to high level discussions of important topics by extremely smart and entertaining people. But it is not merely intellectual pursuits that are the subject of podcasts. It is any specialized area, where the internet has traditionally connected people interested in such niches. I am interested in NBA basketball, especially from an analytics perspective. I can now have access to podcasts from the popular Bill Simmons, but also from the less well known Dunc’d On podcast.

But the intellectual sphere is what I want to emphasize here. I should start with two of the Liberty Fund podcasts. There is, of course, Richard Reinsch’s excellent Liberty Law Talk podcast as well as the equally interesting Econtalk, hosted by Russ Roberts. But there are many others, including Conversations with Tyler and the Wright Show from Robert Wright.

My new favorite podcast is Waking Up with Sam Harris. Until a couple of months ago, I had only known of Harris as one of the new atheists – one who I had not read or listened to. Since that time I have discovered that Harris is much more than that. While I have still not listened to much about his atheism – and therefore cannot assess his particular arguments in that sphere – I have listened to his podcast in a variety of other areas. Whatever area one listens to, however, I am confident that the discussion is at a high level.

Harris’s overall political orientation is clearly liberal, but unlike so many other people of our age, he is not tribal. He calls them as he sees them, and he often sees them differently than other liberals. He is a strong advocate of reason and the freedom to espouse it. Thus, he strongly condemns identity politics, and that often gets him into trouble with other liberals.

In an act that is almost unique in our age, Harris invited Charles Murray on to his podcast to discuss Murray’s work generally and on the Bell Curve in particular. Harris had concluded that Murray had been unjustly vilified by SJWs and the academic liberal community generally to an unprecedented degree. Harris had realized that years before, he had refused to participate in a symposium because Murray was involved. But later he read Murray’s work and concluded it was virtually all mainstream. Murray had been treated unfairly.

What happened? Exactly, what Harris could have predicted. He was attacked by a variety of SJWs – both on Twitter and on Vox, including by SJW scientists. Vox editor Ezra Klein eventually debated him on the podcast, and it was clear that Klein felt it was acceptable to attack Harris in order to promote the cause of social justice.

I find Harris quite interesting, because there are a number of issues where I agree with him and a number where I don’t or am not sure. It is with smart thinkers of this type that I have found you can learn the most. He does not talk much, if at all, about economics. My sense is that if he had my view of economics – if he were a Hayekian – he would be a kind of libertarian. But even though he is not a libertarian – or perhaps because of it – there is so much of interest in what he says.

Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on May 10, 2018 at 11:58:01 am

"Harris has referred to Catholicism as "ghoulish machinery set to whirling through the ages by the opposing winds of shame and sadism", and asserts that the Catholic Church has spent "two millennia demonizing human sexuality to a degree unmatched by any other institution, declaring the most basic, healthy, mature, and consensual behaviors taboo." Harris has criticized the Catholic Church's structure and forced celibacy within its ranks for attracting pedophiles, and blames its opposition to the use of contraception for poverty, shorter lifespans, and the proliferation of HIV/AIDS."

First thoughts: "675 Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, "a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh."

"With Love, Comes Responsibility", Atheism is merely a form of idolatry for those who desire not to be responsible for all the times they failed to act in accordance with True Love, that which always desires to serve in a capacity that reflects respect for the inherent Dignity of the human person, who, from the moment of conception, has been created in The Image and Likeness of God, equal in Dignity, while being complementary as a beloved son or daughter, Willed by God, The Ordered Communion Of Perfect Complementary Love, The Mst Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity, worthy of Redemption.

Atheism is a form of libertarianism that places the will of the creature above that of our Creator, and for that reason alone, an atheism will always result in the worshipping of false idols. Let's hope that in "waking up", he does not continue to live as if it "groundhog day".

read full comment
Image of Nancy
Nancy

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.