fbpx

Coronavirus and Public Trust: The View from France

The coronavirus situation in France, as elsewhere, seems unreal. Our lives are stopped and we don’t understand exactly why. We stay at home to support the “war” against the COVID-19 virus, but many don’t see clearly what the martial rhetoric of President Emmanuel Macron, his ministers, and mainstream media analysts is about.

First of all, questions have been raised about the health situation itself. If we study the numbers, it’s not that obvious that we are in a crisis situation. On April 14, a little more than 1.9 million people have been infected and a little more than 125,000 people died all over the world. Of course, these numbers are impressive. But just compare them to the numbers from the H1N1 epidemic in 2009: at least 60 million people contracted the illness and the WHO estimates that between 100,000 and 400,000 people died. At that time, we didn’t stop the economic life of almost every country on Earth. Of course, we can imagine that perhaps European politicians have some information about the true numbers of COVID-19 in China—where the communist leaders clearly lied and hid the truth. But we can only imagine, and that’s partly why the situation seems so unreal.

The contrast is striking between this blurry daydream and the public discourse: President Macron insists in all his speeches on the trust we should grant to science. He always refers to his scientific advisers. This scientistic discourse—and the insistence that science can and should define political outcomes is no longer a generally shared consensus. It is fitting that this small, strange virus is named after its crown-like shape, for like a king, it has exerted control over our world and even challenged the rule of the scientific, modern project.

For centuries we have collectively trusted science and human reason to “rule and possess” nature, as Descartes invited us to do. Sadly, after world wars, totalitarianism, and genocide, we are not so sure that human reason alone is the best path to wisdom and happiness. This crisis is only reinforcing that doubt.

The lack of trust is not only a fundamental issue for science. It’s even more of an issue for the politicians who claim to use science to direct their policies. We usually still believe in the authority of “people who know”—of scientists. But we always suspect politicians of lying and seeking their own interest rather than the country’s good. In France, this lack of trust is linked to a lot of strange and even contradictory political decisions. In particular, the government’s response to the virus outbreak is tainted by conflicts of interest: the former recent health minister, Agnès Buzyn, is married to the director of INSERM, the main public medical research center, and is said to be closely linked with the pharmaceutical industry. Three years ago, many people (including some doctors) accused her of imposing 11 compulsory vaccines to provide revenue for this industry.

A large part of the current debate comes back to this issue. Many citizens suspect that the health ministry’s opposition to Professor Didier Raoult, one of the most talented epidemic specialists, can only be explained by financial interest. Raoult suggests that using a treatment based on chloroquine (a common and inexpensive anti-malaria treatment) could be efficient for a lot of people infected by COVID-19. The health ministry, however, seems to be very cautious of—if not hostile to—this treatment. Once again, it’s very difficult for non-specialists to know the truth, but public trust in political speech is not strengthened by this strange soap opera!

The departure of Agnès Buzyn at the end of January, when the epidemic was expected to arrive in France, is also surprising and feeds suspicion—especially since Buzyn says that she warned the Prime Minister and the President, before her departure, about the pandemic risks.

The virus has driven home the reality that we cannot always know the truth about our own situation or trust that our leaders always have the right answers.

The general distrust and cynicism toward politicians are further reinforced by public attacks against citizens by President Macron and his ministers. For example, on March 13, President Macron gave a very solemn speech inviting us to stay at home. But he added that we had to vote for local elections two days later. It was a beautiful sunny Sunday and many French citizens took advantage of this election to go, for the last time, into parks or forests. Subsequently, President Macron told us that we were irresponsible to spend this Sunday outside! And now we begin to discover that many citizens were contaminated at voting locations. In response, Didier Lallement, Paris Prefect of Police simply explained that if somebody is contaminated, it’s his own fault: he shouldn’t have gone outside!

As another example, just over a month ago, certain government ministers said that France would not be reached by the virus. And even if France could be reached, it would be a very small number of cases and our healthcare system was ready to deal with it.

The strangest example is probably the government’s position on masks: three weeks ago, masks were judged incapable of preventing the spread of the virus and were considered to be possibly dangerous. Now, they are absolutely necessary to stop the virus’s spreading, and the government, which is so very careful about our health, ordered hundreds of millions of masks from China.

This succession of contradictory statements, embellished by ministerial insults and technocratic arrogance, cannot inspire trust in our political leaders or in the supposedly scientifically based policies they impose.

A similar skepticism of those in power is taking hold when it comes to the personal, political, and economic side of this crisis. We are now confined at home, receiving a massive flow of information, while we watch the rapid destruction of our fragile economy, and our moral condition is worsened by the closure of churches. Logically, most French people are looking to the “day after”—to what will happen after this confinement ends.

The main threat is the increasing anger of the population, especially from those confined in small apartments and cramped places while public disorder all around them slowly rises. This anger is already palpable: more than 100,000 legal complaints have been filed against the government for its catastrophic management of the crisis. But it could escalate to violence if the confinement lasts after the month of May.

Another threat is to our civil liberties: everybody can understand that an exceptional situation requires exceptional means. We can accept this lack of freedom, but only if we believe it’s temporary and not a test for social engineering.

Finally, the pandemic has also cast doubt on the reigning consensus concerning much of our social and economic life. This should give us some hope. Social networks rustle about new forms of economic, and more broadly human, organizations. Many have said that our towns are not “resilient.” But some people now dream of coming back to the countryside and developing a safer economy, reviving factories in France, and consuming local products. (The average citizen learned through this crisis that many of our drugs are produced in China, the heart of the epidemic!) Economic optimization and trade must be balanced with national security needs, which may require more production of certain essential medical devices and pharmaceuticals in France.

We have learned that old, largely abandoned political concepts could still be useful. The post-‘68 revolution told us that the family was archaic, but we now spend weeks on end with our families; they are now our entire horizon and protection. Modern social science and the politicians that follow it told us that nations were no longer important, and that they were insufficient for managing a crisis in an interconnected world. But the European Union is impotent in this pandemic crisis and everybody seeks safety in the guarantees that only nation-states can provide. We have heard that the march of history will soon destroy borders, making them archaic memories of barbarian times. Now, borders are our main protection against the virus’s spread.

This small, crown-like virus has wielded its power and widely changed our way of thinking about the world and our own life. It has driven home the reality that we cannot always know the truth about our own situation or trust that our leaders always have the right answers, even with the power of modern science and technocratic expertise on their side. It is even more difficult to know if all these new perceptions will be for better or for worse.

Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on April 15, 2020 at 11:03:29 am

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2018/history-tomorrow-without-god

I will Pray that this pandemic, that has demonstrated it is most lethal for our most vulnerable population, will end up opening our eyes to the fact that the atheist materialist United Nations and World Health Organization, along with all their atheist supporters who condone abortion, euthanasia, and sexual immorality, cannot possibly serve for the Good of the posterity and prosperity of this Nation or The World, for in denying Divine Providence, they deny the inherent Dignity of every beloved son and daughter of a human person, and thus deny the essence of Life-affirming and Life-sustaining Salvational Love.

read full comment
Image of Nancy
Nancy
on April 15, 2020 at 12:02:02 pm

Apparently, "HISTORY" took a left turn somewhere along the way and was either lost or stopped at one of those antiquated "borders."

Nice essay and one that is not inconsistent with the situation here in the US. We also "doubt" the experts as they have repeatedly demonstrated themselves and their data to be, at best, unreliable and not capable of either replication or empirical confirmation, and, at worst, the product of some fevered bureaucratic delusional attempt at governmental aggrandizement.

Best of Luck to you and your countrymen.

read full comment
Image of gabe
gabe
on April 15, 2020 at 13:29:26 pm

A disease anywhere is everywhere when it comes to virus NO cure NO hope if your one of the selected ones the virus get ya , then you can thank those who didn't care and gave it to you , governments control behavior by GUNS in swine flu days if you did not wear a mask as instruction you got shot by the [ police

read full comment
Image of MassVocals
MassVocals
on April 15, 2020 at 14:13:32 pm

At the end of his thoughtful essay on France's corona virus experience Dr, Thieulloy says, "It has driven home the reality that we cannot always know the truth about our own situation or trust that our leaders always have the right answers, even with the power of modern science and technocratic expertise on their side." The American experience would suggest a rewording, "It has driven home the reality that we risk not knowing the truth about our own situation and having undue trust that our leaders have the right answers, especially if we convey excessive power to bureaucrats and hold unjustified faith in their prudent use of modern science and their soi-disant technocratic expertise."

read full comment
Image of Paladin
Paladin
on April 15, 2020 at 15:15:41 pm

In regards to the atheist materialist United Nations and World Health Organization, along with all their atheist supporters who condone abortion, euthanasia, and sexual immorality, which we can know through both Faith and reason, cannot possibly serve for the Good and thus, the posterity and prosperity of this Nation or The World, for in denying Divine Providence, they deny the inherent Dignity of every beloved son and daughter of a human person, and thus deny the essence of Life-affirming and Life-sustaining Salvational Love, today, we hear the first talk of the “new normal”, without the details, except for the erroneous claim that no one is to blame, including The UN, The WHO, and China. How can that be a fact, when we have yet to determine whether the “escape” of this virus, was accidental or intentional, keeping in mind that this virus is fatal to the most vulnerable among us, and every atheistic materialistic Nation has demonstrated, time and time again, that the most vulnerable among us are not their concern.
Public Health
Environment
Economics
Civil Rights
Social Justice
All of which may sound “normal”, depending on who is in charge. The question is, do we desire to be a Nation who desires to orient themselves to Divine Providence, which, like Life-affirming and Life-sustaining authentic Love, can only serve for The Common Good or do we desire to claim that Love is relative, and thus desire to Render onto Caesar or ourselves, what has always belonged to God?

That is the question that Andrew Cuomo’s Bishop, if he truly Loves him, and thus desires Salvation for him, should be asking him, because, at the end of the Day, you cannot be following The Christ, if you do not recognize The Truth Of Love, even when He May Be Standing There Right In Front Of You, you may still claim that The Truth Of Love, is merely a matter of opinion.

Today’s Press Conference-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlTXHVbQnRc

See Minute 5:20-5:22
With Divine Providence, It is possible to have Liberty and a Happy Death.
Just do not be surprised that if you choose to deny Divine Providence, all hell breaks loose.

read full comment
Image of Nancy
Nancy
on April 18, 2020 at 11:47:41 am

Whatever else comes from the covid lockdown, it is a test of our social systems for the time when a more serious disease arrives. This relatively minor disease is showing us the cracks in our various systems that will cause problems when a disease eventually pops up that has, say, a 25% death rate--whether naturally occurring or man made. (Have you considered that today's response to covid could have something to do with a credible man made threat? Anthrax, anyone?) We should be studying our responses today, and preparing appropriately.

read full comment
Image of Scott Amorian
Scott Amorian
on April 19, 2020 at 12:04:27 pm

If this is true, regarding dating strangers, Mr. Fauci has lost all credibility :

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/04/anthony-fauci-on-new-rules-of-living-with-coronavirus

read full comment
Image of Nancy
Nancy

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

Related