Law & Liberty's Top Forums of 2019
Since the inception of our site, Law & Liberty has published a monthly Forum. There, we gather writers to discuss controversial books, movements, and ideas of importance to the conversation about freedom and responsibility.
We are proud to present the top three most-read forum discussions of 2019:
- September: Nationalism
How to Get Through the “Nationalism” Minefield, by Steven F. Hayward
Self-Rule Is the Basis of American Nationalism . . . Not Natural Rights, by Ted McAllister
A Nation Is a Place of Hard Choices, by William Voegeli
When “Constitutional Patriotism” Is Not Enough, by Wilfred M. McClay
Nationalism or Bust!, by Steven F. Hayward
- November: The Revolution of 1989
Beyond the Ideological Lie: The Revolution of 1989 Thirty Years Later, by Daniel J. Mahoney
Lie and Practice before 1989, by Krassen Stanchev
Nationalism and the Spirit of 1989, by Peter Mentzel
1989 and the Persistence of Ideology, by Flagg Taylor
Anti-Totalitarianism Is Better than Faux Liberalism, by Daniel J. Mahoney
- July: The Success and Failure of Legal Conservatism
Is Legal Conservatism as Accomplished as It Thinks It Is?, by Jesse Merriam
Originalism: A Unitarian Church for the Legal Profession?, by Michael S. Greve
Originalism, the U.S. Constitution, and the Continuity of Fusionism, by John McGinnis
Abandoning Originalism Wouldn’t Be Very Conservative, by Michael Rappaport
Notes on a New Fusionism, by Marc O. DeGerolami
Normative Foundations of Originalism, by Michael O’Shea
Conservatives and Originalism: Their Relationship, Reconsidered, by Jeff Pojanowski