The United States fares badly on the World Happiness Report. Who cares?
Reuven Brenner
Macroeconomics is little more than astrology, but there are better ways to measure the strength of an economy.
In many ways, the entire macroeconomic sector is comparable to astrology.
Election results could be predicted with much greater accuracy if we allowed people to bet on them.
The seventeenth century playwright had suggestions for what to do with young people who get lost in pretentious ideas and pursuits.
Higher education debt relief and subsidies do not solve problems—they aggravate them.
Tolerance has never been maintained by "education," but by policies and institutions that offer hope for prosperity, social mobility, and accountability.
The economic policies of the Second World War and our recovery from it present an opportunity for us to see where history rhymes.
Astrology, like statistical modeling today, drew on often impenetrable jargon, sustaining the exclusivity of those who practiced it.
The Exodus story is about the creation of a society capable of withstanding the eventual decline that comes with affluence over many generations.
Large as the debt numbers are, the United States continues to be the preferred destination for the world’s savings.
The use of -isms distracts us from the basic question: what political and private institutions are better at matching people to capital?
A new book by a Harvard Business School professor does not, alas, illuminate what it might be.
Reuven Brenner formerly held the Repap Chair at McGill University’s Desautels Faculty of Management and serves on the board of IEDM. He is the author of many books and monographs, including History: The Human Gamble, The Force of Finance: Triumph of the Capital Markets (Thomson/Texere, 2002). He has also authored a series of articles on finance and currency issues for American Affairs.