fbpx

On the “Religion of Humanity”

In my response to Paul Seaton’s Liberty Forum essay, I mentioned once the phrase “religion of humanity” that can be found in Manent’s works. As Professor Seaton points out, this is an important concept that the French philosopher uses to explain the current trend toward homogeneity in the world. Seaton claims that the term was used first by Auguste Comte. This may be so, but in fact its roots are deeper than that and are worth a second look. Consider, for example, the end of chapter four of Manent’s Cours familier de philosophie politique (2001). There he pointed out the contrast between Rousseau and Dante on this issue, a tension that we still live with today. The first denied that a universal natural society might exist, while the latter believed in the possibility of a general society of humanity. If one sides with Rousseau, Manent wrote, one is likely to become in the end a partisan of the nation-state. But if one agrees with Dante that there is a universal society that links all human beings beyond their local attachments, one should be open to the current European project and would agree with its philosophical underpinnings. Hence the phrase “religion of humanity” should not be discounted too easily, as Manent himself suggests. We don’t know yet who was right: Rousseau or Dante? The verdict is still out. Humanity as “un ensemble des hommes vivants”, to use Manent’s own words, may have only a potential existence. Nonetheless, it would be imprudent to say that that it cannot have a political existence as well. Time alone will tell.
Reader Discussion

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.

on June 29, 2017 at 13:03:19 pm

1) Manent does not use the phrase and concept 'the religion of Humanity' 'to explain the current trend toward homogeneity in the world.' He uses it to name the core element in the social imaginary informing the construction of the EU, at least since the Maastricht Treaty. 2) I did not claim that Comte was the first to use the term. I am not Rémi Brague, who has information like that at his fingertips. I just indicated that Comte used it before Manent, as Manent himself has often noted. 3) the religion of humanity is not humanity. The first is a view of Humanity as actually, or virtually, unified, with no significant differences; the latter is a reality, composed of individuals and groups who share a common humanity, and many similarities and differences. To say that they are connected as superficial to deeper is a category mistake. 4) 'Or l'humanité ne constitue pas un corps politique puisqu'elle est incapable de se gouverner elle-même.' Le regard politique, p. 200.

read full comment
Image of Paul seaton
Paul seaton

Law & Liberty welcomes civil and lively discussion of its articles. Abusive comments will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to delete comments - or ban users - without notification or explanation.