Breyer makes unsupported claims about originalism and defends a brand of legal interpretation that would obfuscate the law.
Why don't politicians and judges see the deep relationship between economic and political rights?
Oren Cass presents himself as a truth-teller recovering a suppressed economic history, but this hoary old tale has been told before.
American elites accepted the economic theory of "comparative advantage" mainly because it justified their geopolitical agenda.
New critiques of mainstream economics are often half-baked and hyperbolic, but they may still be potent politically.
What would a small town look like if it were run like a faculty meeting?
Canadians have their own kind of conservatism, but it has struggled to gain a foothold in national politics.
The controversy surrounding recent judicial reforms reflects deep and longstanding divisions on the role courts in Israeli society.
Though he is occasionally prone to overconfidence, Joseph Epstein does understand the value of the novel.
Those troubled by the present state of American politics might take some comfort in seeing how Publius addressed the challenges of his own age.
Natural law is not some theory hanging in the clouds, but an essential element of the very act of judging.
In spite of its best attempts, Mere Natural Law does not yet provide a framework for a conversation between originalism and natural law.
In the twentieth century, various intellectual factions struggled to define how conservatism should respond to a transformed constitutional order.
The Slaughter-House Cases reached the right conclusion for the wrong reasons.